Books I want to read in January and February

There are tons of great books coming out this year. Here are a few I’m most interested in reading in the next two months:

 

The Flame Alphabet by Ben Marcus

I read an excerpt of this a while ago. Although the premise seems like it could go either way, the subtle way it’s handled in the first chapter caught my interest. The trailer, however, is anything but subtle.

 

The Map and the Territory by Michel Houellebecq

I also read a short excerpt of this and am pretty interested to see where it goes. Even the expert incited a fair amount of controversy around my office so I’m eager to hear reactions to the whole book.

 

Life Sentences: Literary Judgments and Accounts by William H. Gass

I haven’t read much Gass but what I have read I’ve liked. Plus, when we were walking around Powell’s my co-worker literally started jumping up and down when I mentioned his name. She does that a lot, but still.

 

Satantango by László Krasznahorkai

This is probably the one I’m most excited to read that is coming out in the next couple of months. I saw the Bella Tarr movie a few years ago (at the time I was under the impression that the movie was only four hours long. It is not.) and I loved it. I’m pretty sure it won’t take much longer to read the book than it does to watch the movie.

 


Zona: A Book About a Film About a Journey to a Room by Geoff Dyer

This one sounds like it will be pretty cool. It’s apparently about Geoff Dyer’s obsession with Andre Tarkovsky’s 1979 film Stalker.

 

There are a lot more books coming out this year that I’m excited about but that will do for now. The Millions has a great list (which is where I got these) so you should check it out if you’re interested.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books

Books: A Room With a View

 

The first book I read this year was A Room With a View.  I can’t quite say why I picked it other than it was free on kindle and I thought “I’ve never read this book before.” I think that’s going to be a theme this year.

Man, Victorian literature sure knows where a girl’s heart lies, which is to say that men who are emotionally unavailable, vaguely troubled, and certainly unattainable, are hot–even when they don’t get much time in scene. Here’s what I love and also kind of hate about this book: from the first page (I assume it was the first page since I was reading it on the kindle) we know we want Lucy to hook up with George and that’s what carries us through the whole story, even though there’s only one short scene that establishes his character.  We also know that we don’t want her to hook up with Cecil from the moment we’re introduced to him. This book cashes in on the romantic imprint that forbidden love/radical free thinking is sexy and conventional thinking is not; it does it in a pretty brilliant way.

The fact that George’s character is relying heavily on this romantic imprint (if that’s the right term) caused me to step back for a moment. Look, I know we all really like George, but we don’t actually know him nor do we ever really get to know him. But we know what counts; he’s cute, he’s troubled and he’s probably mistaken for a dick when really he’s just very complex and probably feels emotions of such depth that only the right woman can decipher them (also he knows how to handle a girl who  faints and one who’s just fallen into a bed of violets, read: he’s attentive and bold).

Although I can’t really say what causes me to fall for men in real life, I can say that I rarely ever do fall for them the way I do in fiction (Victorian fiction in particular). And when it does happen, I realize that–like Lucy and Geroge–I barely know these men and my attraction to them is built more on a construct I’ve made up than the actual person. It’s probably true that this construct is heavily influenced by these types of stories. Therefore, am I attracted to emotionally unavailable men because I like Victorian literature? Or is it the other way around?

“You can’t fall in love with someone you don’t know” I once told a girl I babysit. This sentiment does not hold true in the world of E.M. Forster, Jane Austin, the Bronte Sisters, et al.  In that world lust=true love, and I’m honestly sort of fine with that on a literary level but I don’t buy into it on a practical level.

He’s Not an Asshole He’s Just Misunderstood

Which leads me to the “he’s not an asshole, he’s just misunderstood” sentiment that permeates Victorian literature (it’s especially effective in Pride and Prejudice).

Here’s something infuriating: I’ve recently found myself saying this exact phrase applied to a person in real life. Once it was out of my mouth I instantly felt a mix of shame and horror. Did that shame and horror make me rethink the actual sentiment? Did it lead me to consider that the subject might, in fact, be an asshole? It did not.  When his asshole status was later confirmed did I reproach myself? Of course, but by then the damage had been done. (Whether he was misunderstood remains undetermined).

That’s the great/troubling aspect of A Room With a View. Great because we know that, were this real life, George would undoubtedly end up being a dick and Lucy would be stuck with him because the novelty of dating a dick wears out after awhile and it’s not like she can just divide up their books and records and try dating women. But we don’t have to worry about what happens after the end of the book. We get our initial impulse met and a sense of romantic fulfillment (win!). (According to Wikipedia, some versions of the book come with an appendix that explains what happens to the happy couple. My free kindle version didn’t include this so I’m free to hang onto that fulfillment for as long as I please.)

It’s troubling because I’ve never seen an example where pure lust=true love or even a happy relationship where one of the people involved is a brooding, emotionally unavailable radical. I also find the myth that a man just needs the love of a good woman to unlock his emotional insecurities unsettling and consistently untrue.  But I guess that’s the thing about this kind of fiction, I don’t want to be taken in by it because I think it’s unrealistic but, in the end, I always am taken in by it, and happliy so.

I’m pretty curious what a male read on this book would be. Certainly there are political and cultural implications that I’m not even touching on but, at this moment anyway, I’m more interested in a male take of the romance. This makes me think of a film review of “Sideways”  written by A.O. Scott  that appeared in the New York Times several years ago. He says:  “It both satirizes and affirms a cherished male fantasy: that however antisocial, self-absorbed and downright unattractive a man may be, he can always be rescued by the love of a good woman. (What’s in it for her is less clear.)”

In the end, I really enjoyed this book for all the girly reasons you like a book like this and, beyond that, the skillful way that political and social assumptions were woven into characters with out much more than hints to those characters’ true natures. I gave it four stars on Goodreads although three and a half is probably more accurate. I’ll also read A Passage to India, which is the book I would have started with if I had been thinking about it.

Up next? Hard to say. I started Infinite Jest last week–again without any forethought–but it seems unlikely that I will finish that in anything closely resembling a timely manner so maybe I’ll set that one aside and read something that’s not 1,000+ pages.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books

New Year’s Resolution

It seems like every December for the past couple of years I’ve gone on a reading binge. Last year, while I was in India, I read seven books. This year I read four over Christmas. I thought I should make more of an effort to read throughout the year and not just at the end of it. So call it a new year’s resolution. I am going to read everything I can and I’m going to write about it because a.) I often forget half the things I’ve read and b.) I could use the  practice.

First up, E.M. Forster’s A Room With A View. 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Other Stuff

Jon Stewart said I have the name of a prostitute

 

I was home watching clips of last night’s Daily Show when something I never expected happened: Jon Stewart called me a whore. Well he implied that Desiree is the name of a prostitute anyway.

My first thought was “really? That’s a little harsh.” Then I thought “well, that explains some things.” It’s not the first time something like this has come up.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Indecision 2010 – Unforced Errors Edition
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Rally to Restore Sanity

On a snowboarding trip in Canada, an instructor asked me my name. When I told him he said “That sounds like a porn star.” Here’s a little tip for any of you that might be confused about this, telling a complete stranger that they have a name of someone who puts things in orifices for a living is not flattering. That’s something you should probably keep to yourself.

Turns out Desireé Cousteau is the name of a famous porn star from the 1970s most famous for her roles in the movies Pretty Peaches and Inside Desiree Cousteau. Nice job doing your homework on that one mom and dad. That’s what you get for letting the nurse name me.

Fortunately, porn stars and prostitutes are not the only professions my name brings to mind. Once at a party I mentioned my name and some douche bag said something like “isn’t that a stripper name?” The thing is I’ve lived with a stripper and I’ve learned that their real names are always something like Stormthousand or Tiara while their stage names are Sarah or Beth. So no Desiree is not a stripper name—Jackass.

This new insight into my name does shine some light onto previously unexplained phenomena in my life. I spent one summer off from college at my brother’s house. I somehow accidentally managed to die my hair purple (a long story and not a very interesting one). That same night my cousin and I were going to see Yo La Tango in Seattle. We parked the car downtown and as I got out, this guy passed by and, very forcefully, called me a slut. He proceeded to walk straight into a parking meter, which knocked him over. Because there was a crowd waiting on line to see the show, tons of people watched as he writhed around in pain. No one seemed to have much sympathy.

A week later, I was remodeling my brother’s spare room. When I went out to my car to grab some boards, a guy in a truck drove by, slowing down as he spotted me. He stopped the car just long enough to yell, directly at me, “Whore, fucking whore, fucking-two-bit-cock-sucking whore.” I wiped the sawdust off of my hand and gave him a friendly wave as he drove further into the sub division. I looked over at the neighbor just in time to watch her glance up from her gardening and give me a look of pure disgust.

Once I had time to process what had happened, I was shocked. Not just by the fact that people still used the phrase two-bit, or that someone took the time to drive around using redundant slurs like cock-sucking whore, but because it was the second time in as many weeks that something like this had happened.

Taking into account that I had never been accused of such promiscuity, I combined that with the fact that I had never before had purple hair. At the time, the two seemed to correlate quite nicely. But now I’m not so sure. Is it possible that the two men somehow knew I had the name of a prostitute and felt the need to remind me of that? I will never know.

I’ve never really felt like my name suited me, this is probably because I am not a prostitute, but over the years I have come accustom to it. Now though, it occurs to me that it might be time to try something that fits my personality better. When I was in college I knew a girl who changed her name from Mara to Yeshishe (or something like that). She said it was because she was becoming a Buddhists and her name no longer suited her. So for the rest of the semester the entire class had to call her Yeshishe, which meant something like the wisdom of God, a fact I found extremely annoying. Turns out, while I always thought that Mara was a lovely name, it was the name of a demon who turned into a beautiful woman and seduced the Buddha. It’s also synonymous with unskillfulness and the death of the spiritual life, so not the best name for someone serious about the faith, I guess.

According to baby-names-adoption.com, Desiree means so long hoped for, crave and, of course, desire—not the best Buddhist name either. If you think about it, it’s really sort of a terrible name. None of those things are virtues of a decent human being but flaws of a hopelessly addicted junky or a person who can’t keep from wanting. That is certainly not the type of person I want to be nor are those the qualities I want to be associated with. But even with the moral implications, Jon Stewart slamming it, and Neal Diamond writing a terrible song featuring it (also apparently about a prostitute), it’s still my name and I kind of like it. So maybe in the end it’s not my name that has to change but the image that goes along with it.

1 Comment

Filed under Other Stuff

Notes from Quito: The Revolution Will be Televised

Tire fires across from my apartment


Two weeks ago, a revolution did not take place in Quito and, depending who you talk to, neither did an attempted coup. What did happen is still under debate but it’s pretty safe to say that there was a police strike that escalated and ended in a fire fight. Where was I during all of this? Mostly sitting either in front of my computer screen at work or my television at home. In a country where the government seizes TV stations and defamation of the president is punishable by up to three years in prison, sitting in front of the television ended up being one of the more interesting places to be.

The day started out unremarkably enough but by mid-morning we were getting reports that the police had taken over the airport, effectively stopping all air traffic, and were burning tires in protest of cut benefits. From there, what unfolded was a carefully constructed narrative that followed the rules of dramatic story structure so well it could have been taught in an intro to fiction class.

Source: www.boston.com

The Exposition
The protagonist: The heroic President Rafael Correa, protector of democracy. The antagonist: The defiant rebel police and the conspiring and nefarious Lucio Gutiérrez. The conflict: A new law is enacted cutting police benefits. Police are outraged that they will not receive the pension they were promised. Also they have guns. Gutiérrez, the former president of Ecuador who was removed from office in 2005 and subsequently jailed, once vowed to “use all legal and constitutional means to retake power.” He ran for president again in 2009 but lost to Correa. Claiming voter fraud, he was denied a recount and is a known political enemy of the President.

The Rising Action

The rebel police gather all over the country to strike. In Quito they take over the airport and attempt to do the same with the news stations. Reports fill the airwaves that thieves have taken to the streets and are running wild with no one to stop them. Stories of outlaws robbing banks without discretion come over the television and radio. The streets are not safe for anyone. The media shows footage of riots on the streets and tear gas being thrown by angry police in uniform. The picture of Quito is that of a city in revolt—a full-on revolution. That word—revolution—takes hold quickly and sticks around throughout the day.

The President confronts the angry rebel police. He calls them “a bunch of ungrateful bandits,” and says “if you want to kill the president, here he is. Kill him, if you want to. Kill him if you are brave enough” while opening his shirt to show he is not wearing a bullet-proof vest.

Soon he is whisked away. Reports say that he has been kidnapped by the rebels and that he is trapped at a hospital, effectively held hostage with no hope of escape. He remains captive for hours while the city burns and the streets fill with teargas. All the while thieves and malcontents run wild, destroying ATMs and looting.

But the president has full support of the military—the only people who might possibly be successful in defeating the rebel police. Soon the television shows footage of the military gaining control over the airport. But just as quickly, the anti-narcotic police branch, along with supporters of the villainous Gutiérrez, retake it.

Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

The Climax
After ten hours of being held captive, the president calls in 500 troops to come to his rescue. The military comes with fully automatic weapons. Cameramen crouch behind concrete barriers as they film the ensuing fire fight. For forty minutes the military face off against the police. They crouch behind buildings and dodge bullets as they try to infiltrate the heavily guarded hospital. The army forces, in full uniform, crouch behind buildings and dodge bullets as they try to infiltrate the heavily guarded hospital.

The Falling Action
The car is filmed driving away with the president safely inside. As it speeds down the road shots are fired. One man falls in the view of the camera. The car drives away. Word comes in the military havae secured the airport and the police are defeated.

The Dénouement
The president arrives at the presidential palace where thousands of his cheering supporters are gathered waiting for him. Giant video screens and loud, patriotic music plays as people yell his name. He gives a long and passionate speech to his countrymen. The people chant “Correa our friend, the people are behind you.” He ends his speech declaring that villain behind this, Gutiérrez and his rebel flunkies, will pay for their attempt to oust him and for threatening democracy. It’s over. A happy ending.

WTF?
So there you have it, in real life things can be wrapped in a nice tidy bow in under 24 hours—just like in the movies. That’s the beauty of government run media, the good guy always wins. And, although the Quito on TV didn’t exactly look like the Quito I was seeing outside my window, the one on the TV was insanely exciting.

I have to say that is was weird when I walked home from work (fearing for my safety) and did not find criminals looting the stores and carjacking motorists, but instead saw kids playing soccer in the streets and people sipping drinks on the patios of various bars. It was equally bazaar the next day when I learned that no banks had been robbed and only two ATMs were damaged.

The big question: was this a coup attempt? An article from the The Wall Street Journal says no. Reporter Mary Anastasi O’Grady writes in her article “What Really Happened in Ecuador” that eyewitnesses inside the hospital say that the president walked into the hospital and was never under any physical harm. She speculates that because the president already had an approval rating of over 50%, a coup wouldn’t make sense:

Recent history suggests that Ecuadoran governments topple only after their public approval falls first. Without popular support to remove Mr. Correa, a coup—by all accounts there was no leader—was not going to happen.

Yet many other news sources say that a coup attempt is the only thing that makes sense, pointing to the fact that the police overtook the airport and attempted to take over two media outlets. They also clearly threw teargas at the president and were outside the hospital when then military came to rescue him (although it’s really hard to tell from the footage how many police officers were there).

So, it’s been hard to untangle the facts from the propaganda. It is interesting that in the months leading up to this, Correa had threatened to dissolve the congress and rule by decree because of a deadlock on proposed reforms. But, since September 30, he has said that he will not dissolve the congress and a few days after the so-called coup attempt, the defense minister announced a pay raise for police.

Now when you google the words “Ecuador coup” things pop up like “attempted assassination of the president” and “Ecuador coup attempt engineered by CIA.” You also find articles like the one in the Washington Post that insists the police strike was not an attempt to overthrow the government but only a strike and that the president used it for his own benefit. It’s hard to say what really happened. My sense is that the truth falls somewhere between the The Wall Street Journal and the conspiracy theorists.

Sitting in front of the TV watching the president address the crowd in a distinctly cinematic fashion—on the balcony of the presidential palace fervently condemning his opponents, Eva Peron style—it’s easy to feel a sense of pride and even nationalism for a country that I do not belong to, and in doing so, forget who’s telling me the story and what message might benefit the storytellers most. But the things is, at least two people died that day (various news outlets reported two-eight people dead) and their families have different stories to tell.

So I think, even though I admire the storytelling ability of the of government controlled media—the strong characters, the well structured plot and the ability to wrap things up before I lose interest—I prefer a different method of storytelling, one that can be more messy and might have a less satisfying dramatic narrative but that hopefully has some facts thrown in here and there.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Ecuador, Travel

Notes from Quito: Wheelchairs, Face Welds, and This American Life.

I just listened to the newest episode of This American Life. This week’s theme was crybabies and, among other interesting and somewhat irritating (because crybabies are irritating) stories, there was a piece about disabled people in California suing businesses that did not comply with current accessibility codes. Under the Americans with Disability Act, people can claim up to $4,000 per violation. There are now some people who make a living going from business to business suing against infractions. Ira Glass calls this phenomenon a sort of “cry baby cottage industry.”

You can listen to the story below. It starts around minute 34.

The story has all sorts of interesting social implications, one being that California has some of the best access for people with disabilities in the country, another that business (like hotels) are starting to deny service to disabled people or are treating them with suspicion due to worry over being sued. But, while you could argue about the benefits vs. the costs in the story, or bring up the downside of an arguably over litigious society, or the benefits to having a system that monetarily holds people and business responsible for their actions, for me, the thing this story brought up was the difference between the U.S. and Quito when it come to accessibility.

In a city were pedestrians not only don’t have the right-of-way but seem to be hunted for sport, Quito is not a place you would expect to have much in the way of accessibility for people with disabilities. With sidewalks that crumble into large holes, sharp curbs that drop off into puddles the size of small ponds, and construction sites that are never marked (my boss was walking one day and came centimeters away from being hit in the face with a welding torch), this city it is not the most wheelchair friendly place I have ever lived.

In the four months I have been here, I have seen exactly two wheelchairs. The first was used by a man wheeling down the middle of a busy street I have to cross on a daily basis and, on a daily basis, fear for my life while doing it. The second was used by a woman who is part of a big family that lives in the park across the street from my house.

For the first man, I would hold no hope that he survived his journey except that he appeared to be exceptionally savvy and, if you’ve lived in Quito in a wheelchair for any period of time you can probably handle a few speeding cars. I can only guess that he was using the street because the sidewalks were in such poor shape that his wheels would not navigate them or that he could not get up on the sidewalk in the first place.

The second woman, I’ve witnessed outside my window taking the family’s small children in her lap and wheeling them around in circles. I sometime catch myself looking down at this group of people who always gather in the same spot under a street lamp—the woman in a wheelchair either playing with the three tiny children or selling cigarettes and gum to passersby, the men helping to direct cars into parking places and then asking for money from the drivers in exchange for protection against thievery. I realize that I am not thinking about how, in the U.S., you would never see a toddler crawling around on the curb or a baby put down for a nap on the pavement—and then suddenly I am thinking that, but with an emotional detachment I do not expect, or like.

I don’t know how the woman in the wheelchair feels about the access in Quito. I don’t know how she feels about her entire family sleeping under the awning of the print shop next door, nor do I know how she feels about me looking down at her from my apartment window almost every night.

More common than people in wheelchairs, are people who should have wheelchairs but don’t. Every day, on my walk home from work, I pass by a man with no legs. He is in the same spot when I pass by around 6:30 each evening. He begs for change. When I first saw him I wondered how he got there. Unable to walk, I imagined that someone he knew dropped him off in a car each day and picked him up each night. Then, one day I saw him on the same street but much further down, begging for change. Since then, I have seen him many times going from his spot in front of the pharmacy to his spot five blocks down. I’ve watched him cross the busy street I usually run across in order to avoid getting hit by cars turning left. Using his arms like crutches, he swings himself down the street.

A friend once told me that he saw two tourists walking down the street. They stopped when they approached him. One by one they took pictures of themselves standing next to him.

I have never given this man money—not once in the dozens of times I have passed by him and he has looked up at me with an outstretched hand. I’m not sure why I haven’t just given him ten or twenty cents, or what it is that compels me to keep moving on without a second thought as to what it might be like to be someone else.

After listening to the This American Life story, I find myself being thankful that, in the U.S., people who cannot walk can own wheelchairs and drive cars and use public restrooms. I wish we didn’t have to be reminded (and in some cases threatened with legal action) to take care of each other—but we do. And, while litigation might not be the best solution, at least it’s something.

1 Comment

Filed under Ecuador, Travel

Fear and Loathing in Quito

So, it’s been awhile since my last post. I actually wrote about a Green Day cover band we saw and about the second robbery attempt in Quito but then my computer ate it and I haven’t been motivated to write anything since. Actually, there hasn’t been much going on that I thought anyone would care about—no robberies, no volcano climbing, there was one shower fire and one earthquake but meh.

Mostly I’ve been working and going out a fair bit. We had a house party once and some nights I just sit in the living room with my roommates and a few friends while everyone smokes and I try to follow the conversation with my loose (at best) grasp of Spanish. These nights I feel very international.

The other night my roommate Kimrey and I went to the oldest Salsa club in Quito with two middle-aged Ecuadorian men, one of them called El Gato who is famous for saying things like “show time” and “toot toot” at random intervals as he pumps his arm up and down as if trying to signal a Simi to honk. Riding in El Gato’s mid-70s BMW, it felt like the beginning of what would probably be a unique night.

I am continually surprised at how many nights out end up feeling like a scene in a Hunter S. Thompson book. This was first pointed out by Kimrey when we went to a hostel to hang out with some new friends our roommate Marc met. They were two men, one South African and one man (read: boy) of questionable origin who dressed like a vampire and said he was half-American half-British and was raised in Mexico. I called him the homicidal counter-part because I’m pretty sure he has killed a man and he seemed to be the South African’s side kick. Picture Fargo if the tall quite guy was a twenty-year-old goth and Steve Bushimi was Eddy Izard and instead of kid napping people in North Dakota, they were the main characters in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, and you’ll have a pretty good idea of what we were dealing with. Kimrey originally described them as doing “Fear and Loathing in Ecuador” and she was dead on. The South African actually mentioned mescaline at one point.

Ever since that night, things have maintained a level of weirdness that, if you weren’t paying attention, you might miss. At the salsa club, El Gato’s friend sat across from me drinking whiskey. A fifty year-old man, he looked like the college professor you probably had if you went to a liberal arts school. He wore a blazer, a tee-shirt that said something about feminism written in Portuguese, and glasses that rested low on his nose—these made him look particularly intellectual. During an awkward lull in conversation, he asked me if I liked Jack Kerouac and I said no. He seemed truly offended by this and he asked me why. I had a hard time expressing my reasons in Spanish and clearly whatever I was saying wasn’t satisfying him. If I could have said it in English, I would have said that I thought Jack Kerouac was a self-indulgent asshole whose narratives were completely unrelatable to me as a woman. Instead I said “No es para mi.” Then he asked me whether I preferred Truman Capote or Jack Kerouac. I never thought that I would be sitting in a salsa club comparing those two writers, in Spanish. I found myself trying to talk about character development and narrative structure in a language I don’t really speak. It was not working out well for me.

The best part about the evening was the dancing. In Ecuador, the first thing many people ask you is if you like to dance. This is not some ploy to get you into bed (okay maybe it is a little), as far as I can tell it’s a true reflection of the culture. In Ecuador, like most of the places I’ve been to in Latin America, you can’t really go anywhere without hearing music. It’s played on the buses, pumped into the streets, and emanates from cars on the street—Reggaeton, electronica, Salsa, and of course, Lady Gada. So it’s really no surprise that people dance like gods here. I remember one weekend at the beach I passed by a man playing soccer, he ran to catch a loose ball and on his way back to game he whipped out a complex salsa move as the music being played on the beach changed tempo. It was some sort of automatic response to the rhythm, like he couldn’t help himself—I don’t think he could.

So yeah, watching the salsa dancers was, at times, jaw dropping. Having no basic rhythm, I was both baffled and impressed by the effortlessness in movement that comes with having music and dance so ingrained in a culture. I have this theory that dancing is an important part of being human. It’s something that denies analyzation or intellectual deconstruction and instead puts us solidly in our body where I, for one, don’t spend a lot of time. The Ecuadorians I have met are definitely in tune with that in a way I am not.

The night didn’t end there, it ended with us meeting more friends, drinking rum out of a baby doll’s head, planning a Shakespeare company using, as actors, the pack of feral dogs that live in the park across the street (more on those dogs later), taking a taxi across town to get crab burgers and hanging out with a group of 19 year-old Ecuadorian hipsters.

Overall it was a night that left me hung over but loving Quito a little more. It’s a place where the youth culture is vibrant, where kids scream out the lyrics to “Welcome to Paradise” at a Green Day cover show with pure dedication—even though the band isn’t really very good, where people truly don’t understand the phase “I don’t like to dance,” and where you can get an amazing tasting crab burger on the street at 4 a.m.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Ecuador, Travel

4th of July at Mitad del Mundo

So there’s the place here called Bungalow 6. It’s a night club like most night clubs in the touristy part of Quito where I live. But on Wednesdays Bungalow opens it’s door at 8 p.m. and lets in only women. For two hours the women drink for free and for two hours men stand at the windows and watch them until they are let in like stampeding bulls at 10 p.m. My co-worker Nick said they might as well hang a sign over the door that says “women making poor decisions.”

I’ve heard people talking about this place since the day I arrived in Quito, and like most of my female co-workers, I thought it was on the verge of being criminal. But everyone said we had to go at least once, and a free drink is a free drink. So we went.

The place was filled with women, mostly foreigners drinking mojitos and Cuba libres and chatting. I met a very nice Australian woman and we made a plan to go to Mitad del Mundo (the middle of the world) the next weekend. Then we danced and went home without spending a cent.

On Sunday, five of us piled in a cab and drove half an hour out to Mitad del Mundo. Libby had to lay across our laps to keep the driver from getting in trouble for having more than four people in the car.

The place called the middle of the world is pretty much just a tourist trap just outside of Quito. It’s a giant monument that marks the equatorial line. The thing is, it’s not the true equator. Like so many things in Ecuador, it’s just off. The true equator runs about 787 feet to the north but for years tourists would come here to get photos of themselves straddling the line they thought was the equator but was really just a line.

The Fake Equator

Now, with the aide of GPS, the line is marked accurately and a kitschy museum has been built there. We were told by people who had gone before that the monument was just a monument (a poorly placed one) and that the museum, kitschy or not, was the thing that was really worth seeing so we stopped there first.

The Real Ecuator

Touristy, yes. Cheesy, of course. But awesome nonetheless. The museum runs tours in English and Spanish. Our guide, Christian, who spoke English but just, took us through the outdoor displays that conjured images of Disneyland ( if Disneyland had diagrams of how to properly shrink a head and mannequin with giant penises). He told us very specifically what we should be looking at and pointed out things like the penises by saying “this is not very realistic.”

Not the manikin with the giant penis but one holding a shrunken head in a basket.

Christian showed us shrunken heads, blowguns, anaconda skins and he led us in and out of replicas of different kinds of indigenous housing. He pointed out humming birds, gave us fresh bananas he picked off the tree and squashed a bug to show us how the blood makes great red dye.

Then Christian led us to the equator—a tiled line about 500 feet long. All down the line there are exhibits and places to run experiments like balancing an egg on a nail and walking with your arms out stretched to feel the force of the north and south hemispheres pulling you. People speculate that experiments are rigged but I really can’t see how. I do think the claims maybe exaggerated or just made up. It’s supposed to be easier to balance and egg on a nail on the equator, and sure enough Christian balanced the egg, but how many people try to balance an egg on a nail in any other part of the world?

I tried to balance the egg and couldn't.

The coolest part, and for me the part that made it worth the long cab ride and the five dollar entry fee, was when Christian took a tub full of water, placed it on the equator pulled the plug.

The water ran straight down with no swirl. Then he moved the tub just to the right a few feet and the water swirled clockwise, when he move the tub to the left of the equatorial line the water swirled counterclockwise. Seeing the coriolis effect was pretty impressive. Maddy, the Australian woman, said she’d gone to Canada once and filmed a toilet as it flushed then she got home and tried to compare the video to her own toilet but the tape malfunctioned so she never knew if the water in Canada flowed a different direction than the water in Australia. She said seeing this was a very satisfying moment in her life and I have to say that I felt the same.

We left the museum and headed over to the monument but they wanted two dollars to get in, which none of us wanted to pay, so instead we went to lunch where we got a typical almuerzo with soup rice and over cooked meat. The soup came with a chicken foot which freaked everyone out but I didn’t really mind. I wanted to go to a place with cuy (Ginnie pig) but everyone else thought that was gross. I’m starting to realize that my nonchalance with regard to street food and weird meat is not shared by most people, which is unfortunate because it’s always cheaper and usually tastes better than what you get in restaurants. I will say that aside from adding entertainment to our meal, the chicken foot didn’t do much for the soup.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Ecuador, Travel

World Cup

Leave a Comment

Filed under Other Stuff

I thought there was a dead man on my street.

Today, as I walked home from work, I passed a man lying on the street. I live right next door to a hospital and the man was on the sidewalk near the entrance. His eyes were shut, he wasn’t moving. There was a police car parked on the street next to him. Cops stood over him but didn’t appear to be doing anything. A small crowd of people gathered at the doors to the hospital.

I thought he was dead. I thought this because he wasn’t moving and no one seemed to be in a hurry to do anything with him. I passed by quickly, stepping around his body and a puddle of blood near his head.

I didn’t feel well. Not sick but angry and like I might cry but I might just as easily not cry. Why had I just seen a dead man on the street? I knew he was dead because my co-workers we just talking about seeing bodies—on the side walk, in the park—this happens here. He was dead.

Only he wasn’t dead.

When I was twenty-four and travelling through Central American I almost saw a dead body. I was on a bus with an Australian man. We had just met and he was worried about our journey across the border from Guatemala to Honduras. He kept asking me questions and I gave him answers I’d found in the guide book, even though he had the very same book. I didn’t really like him, but I didn’t really dislike him either. If I had known then what I know now I would have called him a clinger, a type of traveler who is traveling alone but is not really capable of traveling alone so just grabs on to any person he finds and stays with them until he finds someone new.

The week I met the Australian had been particularly hard. I had just come from Guatemala where three emotionally draining things had happened to me. The first was at a resort on the shores of Lake Atitlan where I had stayed for two nights. It was recommended by a friend and although it was out of my price range at $13 a night, my friend assured me it was worth it.

The resort was the nicest place I had stayed but ill-fated as it turned out. I should have known this the first day I arrived. Because it was such a popular tourist destination, reservations were essential but hard to arrange while traveling. So, I had to stay at another hostel (only $3 a night), and take a boat over to the resort to make reservations for the following day. The resort was a collection of rooms connected by winding trails that rose from the boat dock up a steep hill until they reached the main lobby. The day I went to make a reservation, I was standing at the desk when I heard someone yelling for help. There was a lot of commotion and it wasn’t until later that I learned a woman had fallen getting off the boat and broken her spine. They were sending for a helicopter to evacuate her. I probably should have taken that as a sign not to stay at this hotel.

The next day was nice. Most of the people staying at the resort were much older than I was but I’d met a lot of cool people. One of them was a teacher from Alaska named Kayla, we hit it off right away and made plans to go horseback riding and hiking together. I also met a woman and her daughter who were from somewhere in the US (I think the south), and were on vacation together. They said they were having a wonderful time.

The next morning Kayla and I left our bags in the hotel office while we went for a hike. When we got back  we found the girl whom we’d met before sitting a corner office talking on the phone.

She said over and over again “I don’t understand, I don’t understand.” Then she was yelling. The phrase she kept saying was so clear to me at the time that I thought I would never forget it, yet now, years later, I can’t quite remember. Maybe she said “you’re wrong,” or maybe it was “I don’t believe you” whatever it was she repeated it like a mantra, only desperate and angry. “I’m in the middle of Guatemala” she said, again turning the statement into a chant until she was alternating between two or three at a time: “You’re wrong, it’s not true, I’m in the middle of Guatemala.” Finally she turned to us, I hadn’t quite understood what was going on, hadn’t yet come to the conclusion that something was terribly wrong.

“Go find my mother” she said. Then, as soon as we left, her urgent insistence that the news she was hearing was wrong, turned into mournful wailing. I found the woman who ran hotel. “I think there’s something wrong with her boyfriend,” I said. I don’t know how I knew this; the girl must have said something that I no longer remember. By that time, it was clear to me that her boyfriend had died.

Kayla and I left the girl with the owner and went to find her mother. Someone said she was in a hammock by the shore, others said she was on the deck. We split up, Kayla found her in a hammock reading. She told me later that the mother somehow already knew. “I think there’s something wrong with your daughter’s boyfriend.” Kayla said. “Is he dead?” the mother asked. Kayla said she thought so, the woman fell silent. Kayla had to hold her steady as they climbed up the steep hillside to get to the daughter.

I was there when they found each other. The mother was almost catatonic. She went from mumbling prayers, one after the other, to becoming completely unresponsive. She did not comfort her daughter who was howling “He’s dead,” screaming it. A doctor was called, he would bring a sedative.

I had never seen agony. I remember thinking that no television show, no movie, had ever looked like this. Kayla and I went for a swim to get out of the way. We bobbed in the lake, not knowing what to say.

I left Lake Atitlan, a place that would, only one month later, be hit by hurricane Katrina which would wreak much more devastation and death on the area than that phone call had.

I headed east and settled into a hostel on the Caribbean coast. I waited there for a sailing trip that promised to take me to Belize. I waited three days. The hostel, right next to the shore, was run by volunteers from the States. It had a large sleeping loft that overlooked the lobby. The second night I couldn’t sleeping. I heard the phone ring and a man answered in Spanish. There was some confusion and he handed the receiver to an American volunteer who must have been standing next to him. I heard her say the words “I don’t understand,” then some things I couldn’t make out. She hung up the phone and said that her ex-boyfriend had been in an accident and he hadn’t survived.

I thought I was dreaming. I did not question it.

The next morning I asked around. It was not a dream, someone really had died.

My sailing trip was canceled, my mother emailed me to tell me that my sister, in Colorado, had West Nile Virus and was in and out of the hospital. She would be alright, don’t worry the email said. I did worry.

Soon I found myself on the bus sitting next to this strange Australian man on my way to the Bay Islands in Honduras. When the bus stopped and the Australian looked out the window and said “Someone’s been hit by a bus. I think he’s dead,” I didn’t look. There was no part of me that wanted to. I had an overwhelming need to be comforted. I wanted to hug the Australian, just cry in his lap. I didn’t say anything.

When he asked if I wanted to share a hotel room I said sure, not really wanting to but wanting to be alone either. I’d shared hotel rooms with so many random people at that point it in the trip it hardly seemed to matter—was just the nature of traveling. That night, I had the first nightmares of my entire trip. I dreamed that someone was trying to get into the room. I woke up instantly and was thankful he was there in the next bed, even if he was still essentially a stranger.

The man lying on the street by my apartment was not dead. As soon as I got in the door I told my roommate about him. We looked out the window and saw the crowd of people had moved in closer, the policed were still standing around, and the person I thought was dead was sitting up.

The ambulance finally arrived which was perplexing because they were literally right outside the emergency room doors. My roommate and I decided to check it out. Now that no one was dead I felt okay. As we walked by the scene, a man with a hose washed the blood into the gutter. The victim was inside the ambulance but it was not going anywhere. I’m not sure how long it stayed there but I never saw it leave.

The dead body that I almost saw in Honduras sticks with me. It’s almost as if I had looked out that window, I can’t imagine it feeling any more potent. Everything that was happening at the time sort of clings to that body: the dead boyfriends, the Australian, and my sister’s illness. There was something surreal about those things together. If I saw a body today lying on the street, if the man had really been dead, how would that stay with me? What if it didn’t? I don’t want to find out.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Ecuador, Other Stuff, Travel